Rediculous to propose or think non-ionizing radiation has a seriously detrimental effect on people. The 'evidence' is bad science. Concentration affected by holding a conversation with one person while doing something else? How is this unusual?
I suggest any support - especially by the BBC which has shown itself repeatedly as a paid shill agency not working in the interest of the common good - suggesting 'non-ionizing radio waves' have any similarity to ionizing radiation/radioactive waste, such as causing cancer - a big hot-button issue for the brainwashed masses - is irresponsible and criminal non-science.
It is clear huge plumes of radioactive waste were sent all around the world, especially in North America, from over 100 above-ground nuclear explosions in and around the 1950's. Real radiation: released from burning coal, DU weapons, polonium-laced commercial tobacco smoke, irradiating the heads of children in one case and from nuclear power 'accidents' is to blame for the increased background radiation picked up on Geiger counters.
The real criminal lobby responsible for these irresponsible and criminal uses of nuclear energy want more than anything for the public to be decieved into believing a person's own use of communication technologies such as WLAN and mobile phones causes the diseases created by the same criminals who are racist and have no care for their fellow man, because they do not believe people not from their own tribal or ethnic background are their 'fellow' man (i.e. Oppenheimer 'I have become destroyer of worlds').
